Food Stamps: Evolution and Rising Take-up Rates

Food Stamps: Evolution and Rising Take-up Rates

Timothy Taylor 03/07/2019 2

The number of people receiving benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), perhaps better know as "food stamps," rose slowly in early 2000s, then leaped during the Great Recession, and now has been sagging lower for a few years, although remaining above pre-recession levels. Victor Oliveira gives a quick overview in "The Food Assistance Landscape:FY 2018 Annual Report" (US Department of Agriculture, April 2019)

Here's a figure showing the number of SNAP recipients and total spending on the program.

And here's a figure showing the percentage of Americans receiving food stamps.

The modest rise in food stamp spending before the Great Recession reflects changes in federal rules making it easier for people to apply, and also easier for states to certify to the federal government that the benefits are being targeted.

The sharp rise in food stamp spending did not reflect any substantial change in eligibility standards. Instead, it mostly showed that many more people fell under the pre-existing eligibility rules when the recession hit. There was also a temporary boost in SNAP benefits in the Recovery Act of 2009. But there was also an additional change. The "take-up rate" for SNAP benefits rose: that is, those who were eligible for benefits were more likely to apply for them and receive them. Dottie Rosenbaum and Brynne Keith-Jennings of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities provide some information in "SNAP Caseload and Spending Declines Have Accelerated in Recent Years" (June 6, 2019). Here one of their figures:

For SNAP, Number Eligible and Participation Rate Higher During and After Recession

What seems to have happened is that more people became aware that they were eligible for SNAP benefits, and even as the unemployment rate has fallen in recent years, the take-up rate for benefits has stayed high. Here's a breakdown by age of what they call the "participation rate," meaning the share of those who are eligible who participate in the program.

SNAP Participation Rates Have Risen, Particularly Among Elderly Individuals and Workers

Of course, these higher participation or take-up rates aren't occurring in a vacuum. People tend to think of the SNAP program as supporting food purchases, but as economists have pointed out for a long time, providing a way for people to buy food also frees up other income to purchase other goods. For this reason, SNAP plays much broader role in the safety net than just a nutrition-assistance program.

For context, SNAP spending was $68 billion in 2018, and it all comes from the federal government with the same rules applying across states. This is about the same size as the Earned Income Tax Credit, counting both tax revenues foregone and refundable credits paid under that proram. As another comparison, total spending on Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) is often thought of as the nation's main welfare program, but it spent only about half as much in 2018--and half of that funding came from states with a high level of variation in benefits. For example, monthly TANF benefit levels for a family of three were $714 in California in 2018, compared with $170 per month in Mississippi. In many states with low TANF benefits, SNAP offers considerably more assistance to low-income families.

A different report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, "Policy Basics:

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)" (June 25, 2019) provides a quick overview of how the program works: 

The average SNAP recipient received about $127 a month (or about $4.17 a day, $1.39 per meal) in fiscal year 2018. The SNAP benefit formula targets benefits according to need: very poor households receive larger benefits than households closer to the poverty line since they need more help affording an adequate diet. The benefit formula assumes that families will spend 30 percent of their net income for food; SNAP makes up the difference between that 30 percent contribution and the cost of the Thrifty Food Plan, a diet plan the U.S. Agriculture Department (USDA) establishes that is designed to be nutritionally adequate at a very low cost.

A family with no net income receives the maximum benefit amount, which equals the cost of the Thrifty Food Plan for a household of its size ...  For example, a family of three with $600 in net monthly income receives the maximum benefit ($505) minus 30 percent of its net income (30 percent of $600 is $180), or $324. ...

SNAP is heavily focused on the poor. About 92 percent of SNAP benefits go to households with incomes at or below the poverty line, and 55 percent go to households at or below half of the poverty line (about $10,390 for a family of three in 2019). 

Thus, what's happening with SNAP benefits in recent years is that the number of people eligible is declining, as it should when unemployment rates have fallen this low, but the take-up or participation rate in the program has remained high. As one more sign of this shift, the share of SNAP recipients who are also working has been rising over time.

Share of SNAP Households with Earnings Has Risen Considerably

A version of this article first appeared on Conversable Economist

Share this article

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

terms and condition.
  • Bryan Lawrence

    Sometimes I remind myself humanity can be restored.

  • Scott Chambers

    One thing I've noticed in life, rich people are very tight with money.

Share this article

Timothy Taylor

Global Economy Expert

Timothy Taylor is an American economist. He is managing editor of the Journal of Economic Perspectives, a quarterly academic journal produced at Macalester College and published by the American Economic Association. Taylor received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Haverford College and a master's degree in economics from Stanford University. At Stanford, he was winner of the award for excellent teaching in a large class (more than 30 students) given by the Associated Students of Stanford University. At Minnesota, he was named a Distinguished Lecturer by the Department of Economics and voted Teacher of the Year by the master's degree students at the Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs. Taylor has been a guest speaker for groups of teachers of high school economics, visiting diplomats from eastern Europe, talk-radio shows, and community groups. From 1989 to 1997, Professor Taylor wrote an economics opinion column for the San Jose Mercury-News. He has published multiple lectures on economics through The Teaching Company. With Rudolph Penner and Isabel Sawhill, he is co-author of Updating America's Social Contract (2000), whose first chapter provided an early radical centrist perspective, "An Agenda for the Radical Middle". Taylor is also the author of The Instant Economist: Everything You Need to Know About How the Economy Works, published by the Penguin Group in 2012. The fourth edition of Taylor's Principles of Economics textbook was published by Textbook Media in 2017.

Cookies user prefences
We use cookies to ensure you to get the best experience on our website. If you decline the use of cookies, this website may not function as expected.
Accept all
Decline all
Read more
Tools used to analyze the data to measure the effectiveness of a website and to understand how it works.
Google Analytics