Comments (1)
-
Leo Potts
Well explained thank you
In the absence of a gold standard, frailty has been operationally defined as meeting three out of five phenotypic criteria indicating compromised energetics: low grip strength, low energy, slowed waking speed, low physical activity, and/or unintentional weight loss . A pre-frail stage, in which one or two criteria are present, identifies a subset at high risk of progressing to frailty. Various adaptations of Fried’s clinical phenotype have emerged in the literature, which were often motivated by available measures in specific studies rather than meaningful conceptual differences.
Patients who are frail before surgery are more likely to have serious complications and mortality afterward and increased costs of care, suggesting that frailty should be factored into risk calculations before surgery.
Consequently, surgeons develop clinical judgement when doing patient selection for surgery. Whether to operate is as important, if not more, than how to operate.
In several ways, organisations and companies are like patients. When they are sick, some interventions , like change management, digitisation, leadership development and innovation initiatives are high risk if the company is frail.
Corporate frailty, is as yet undefined, but might include:
Like frail patients, operating on a sick business when it is frail is associated with complications and higher rates of mortality and patient selection is key to favorable outcomes. Pre-habilitation is a necessary requirement before taking them to the OR. Structure eats culture for lunch.
Arlen Meyers, MD, MBAs is the President and CEO of the Society of Physician Entrepreneurs on Twitter@ArlenMD.
Well explained thank you
Leave your comments
Post comment as a guest