I versus We: The Democratic Debate Rhetoric Worries Me

I versus We: The Democratic Debate Rhetoric Worries Me

Karen Gross 15/01/2020 3

I watched most of the Democratic presidential candidate debate last night on CNN.

Regardless of one’s party, one’s favorite candidate or one’s views on substantive issues or the value of debates in general, I was troubled by certain of the rhetoric displayed by several of the candidates. Bothered, annoyed, scared, worried. All these descriptors work.

As I’ll describe, their use of language frightens me and bodes poorly for their quality leadership on a go-forward basis. To set the stage: For me, leadership that succeeds requires a team — leading is not a solo sport. As athletic teams say on tee-shirts, there is no “I” in team. Leaders need to surround themselves with talent (especially in arenas where the leader has less strength). They need to listen. They need to hear. They need perspectives beyond their own.

Now to my debate point. Several of the debaters/candidates said something that resembled this last night and they did it repeatedly: “When I am president, I will …..” Consider this variation on the theme: “ When I am president, there are over x number of actions I can take on my own….”

Here’s my point — and I think it is rhetorically significant: there is too much “I” and too little “we.” In truth, no president acts unilaterally. So maybe the debaters meant “we” and just said “I.” Leaders in most settings are surrounded by advisors, whether they take the advice or not. They are not in a bubble or an isolation room. Even our current president, who appears to make decisions unilaterally, has gotten advice. Just ask John Kelly.

Why can’t the candidates speak in the “we” mode? “When I am president, we will….”

Isn’t the hope, if not the reality, that the President of the US represents “We the People”? And wouldn’t we want our next president to be more than an “I” man or “I” woman? Don’t we want a leader who has enough strength and ego power to reflect on the views of others before launching — literally and figuratively.

Is humility missing? Is teamwork missing? Are quality advisors and collaborative leadership missing? Is the ego so large that there is real meaning and commitment to following leadership style: I will do this and I will do that and I want this and I will act this way. And I don’t need wisdom from anyone.

For me, true leaders believe in the “we” when they lead. We will accomplish this together. We will find pathways that… we will work to achieve x.

Last night was like nails on a chalk board for me and the phrase kept being repeated by different of the candidates: “When I am president, I will…..”

Here’s my desire: I want a leader whose ego is in check and who can and will listen to others. Then they can say with both honesty and integrity, “When I am president, we will….”

I can hear these candidates saying to me: “Of course I meant we. I was short cutting the language to fit within the time constraints. I was not dismissing how I get my positions or the value of my work with others.

I’m sorry; that’s an excuse. Add to that: This isn’t trivial. Rhetoric messages and the message last night had had way too many “I’s.” Way way way too many. Where were “we?”

A version of this article first appeared on Medium

Share this article

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

0
terms and condition.
  • Connor McCready

    I don't care about the liberals. Trump will win the 2020 election.

  • Naomi York

    Joe Biden is the type of dude to forget that he met you every time he meets you.

  • Christian Angulo

    Let's be clear, Yang has the solution and everyone else is still stuck on the problems.

Share this article

Karen Gross

Higher Education Expert

Karen is an educator and an author. Prior to becoming a college president, she was a tenured law professor for two plus decades. Her academic areas of expertise include trauma, toxic stress, consumer finance, overindebtedness and asset building in low income communities. She currently serves as Senior Counsel at Finn Partners Company. From 2011 to 2013, She served (part and full time) as Senior Policy Advisor to the US Department of Education in Washington, DC. She was the Department's representative on the interagency task force charged with redesigning the transition assistance program for returning service members and their families. From 2006 to 2014, she was President of Southern Vermont College, a small, private, affordable, four-year college located in Bennington, VT. In Spring 2016, she was a visiting faculty member at Bennington College in VT. She also teaches part-time st Molly Stark Elementary School, also in Vt. She is also an Affiliate of the Penn Center for MSIs. She is the author of adult and children’s books, the most recent of which are titled Breakaway Learners (adult) and  Lucy’s Dragon Quest. Karen holds a bachelor degree in English and Spanish from Smith College and Juris Doctor degree (JD) in Law from Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law.

   

Latest Articles

View all
  • Science
  • Technology
  • Companies
  • Environment
  • Global Economy
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Society