Science of Learning - Memory Transfer

Science of Learning - Memory Transfer

Jesse Martin 04/02/2020 3

Short-term memory is exactly what the name implies, memory for the short term. It is the memory you are using to feed your thinking.

The number of items you can hold in short-term memory is between about four and eight (5±2 or 7±2 depending on the research). You keep items active in short-term memory by rehearsing them in your head. You know what this feels like when you get a phone number. As long as you can keep repeating it in your mind, you don’t forget. As soon as another item comes along, you begin to lose part of the number. You can chunk information together and make it one item, so (keeping with the phone number analogy) a familiar area code can be treated as a chunk, even though it is three (or more) numbers long.

In learning, short-term memory must be quickly transferred to working, or episodic memory or it is lost. Working or episodic memory defines what you have in your mind at any given moment. In order to transfer your working memory to long-term memory, you must look for and establish meaningful links to what you already have in your long-term memory. By establishing meaningful, semantic links and associations with the information you already have in long-term memory, you can move your new information from working or episodic memory to a more permanent store – long-term memory. This process of establishing durable links takes effort and energy. Since the brain is a conservative organ (doesn't like to waste energy needlessly), this process is avoided and takes a concerted effort - as anyone who has tried to memorize something - long-term - can attest.

Long-term memory is a durable, permanent store that is organized semantically (or by meaning). There are three aspects to long-term memory: encoding (getting it in there), storage (keeping it there), and retrieval (getting it back out). Formal learning is primarily concerned with encoding and retrieval. However, a lack of understanding of how long-term memories are organized and stored means that there are powerful learning opportunities lost.

Because long-term memory is organized as a semantic network, the information that is transferred to long-term memory is organized according to how related the information is. A caveat is necessary here. The relatedness of information is completely subjective in that individuals decide what and how new information is related to the knowledge that is already in long-term memory. It would be nice to think that my long-term memory organization is truly representative of reality (actually, it is), however, my reality isn’t exactly the same as your reality (so yours is wrong).

The information that is moved to long-term memory is encoded through links to knowledge (information that has been encoded into long-term memory) that we already know, hence the semantic organization. This is important for a couple of reasons. Firstly, because information is attached to knowledge, the more knowledge you have encoded already, the more links you have to encode other information. For this reason, the storage capacity of long-term memory is essentially unlimited. The more you know, the more you can learn.

The other reason for knowing that semantic organization is the way long-term memory works is that as information is added to our long-term store, the information that is there is changed. Our understanding of what we already knew is altered, and (usually) our understanding is deepened - hopefully. Even if it is not altered in a way that actually represents reality any better, it is altered to provide more information that is attached to the knowledge that is already there.

In education, I keep hearing that overassessment is a bad thing. Overassessment is measuring something that has been learned, more than once. Educators believe that this is not good. Once you have measured how well a student has learned something, to measure the same thing again is poor practice. You already know what your student has learned, so you shouldn’t assess it again. However, given what we know about how memory is organized, and since we know that when new information is added, it changes the stored knowledge as well, why wouldn’t we want to ask about a learner's understanding again (overassess)? Asking the same question more than once (if it is a good question) will allow a learner to demonstrate how their understanding of something has developed as they have engaged in their learning opportunities. Labeling overassessment as poor practice is a lost opportunity, due to a lack of understanding of how memory works.

Another problem with formal education and the lack of understanding of how long-term memory works has to do with the retrieval of information.

I remember how fascinated I was when I learned about something called state-dependent learning. I first heard of it as a second-year undergraduate in a Cognitive Psychology class. State-dependent learning is the principle that you will remember much better if your state of recall is closely matched to your state of encoding. A great illustrative example of how this works was a study where memory was tested in scuba gear at the bottom of a pool and in a classroom setting. When the divers learned something at the bottom of the university swimming pool, they could recall it much easier if they were tested on that information at the bottom of the pool than if they were tested on the learned information in a classroom setting at desks. However, they remembered the information that they memorized sitting in desks much better in the classroom than they did at the bottom of the pool.

If you try to recall information in a state (situation, place, mood, etc.) that is as close to the state you were in when you learned the information, your recall will be much better. The take home message (at least for me as a student at the time) is that you need to study for your exams in a state that is as close as possible to the state that you will experience taking the exams. Doing this will maximize your performance and give you the highest grade.

If you actually want to learn something that you might need to access in a different situation sometime in the future, this is the worst possible strategy. You are keeping the knowledge you are learning linked to a single state (in order to maximize exam performance) and are not making links to other times, places and situations where the knowledge might prove useful – the problem of transference of knowledge. When I talk about information in this context, I am also talking about skills, content and any other form of learning. The most critical skills that are often locked away within a specific context are cognitive enablers – knowing how to think.

Since learning in formal education should be about preparing a person for what they need to know in the future, learning should be about accumulating knowledge and skills that will aid in critical analysis, problem-solving, and decision making (all of which need a solid content base from which to work). It is doubtful that many critical decisions or rational problems are going to be solved in rooms that resemble exam halls.

State-dependent learning might improve recall from long-term memory in a specific situation, but it does nothing to build an appropriate content or skill base that a learner can draw on in the future to successfully engage in what the world needs the most of – thinking.

A far better strategy (for learning) is to engage in recall in as many different states as possible. Knowing how to solve problems involving fractions on paper while sitting at a school desk is not a useful skill to have. Being able to apply knowledge about fractions in a kitchen, a building site, an architectural table, an accounting desk or any other situation that could use the skill is what is really useful. Unfortunately, this isn’t often done in education, and overassessment being bad (as a principle) means that it is unlikely to be changed in the near future. Learning content and skills in a setting that results in the highest score on a standardized test is the most useful kind of learning available in today's world.
 

On another note, I’ve developed an app to help students (and others) begin to think about their thinking. A rather abstract thing to do, but it is a beginning to acquiring abstract cognitive enablers – cognaware.com

 

Share this article

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

0
terms and condition.
  • Robert Taulo

    Excellent article

  • Alex J

    Good explanation, thanks for sharing your opinion.

  • Vikas Nainani

    Insightful post

Share this article

Jesse Martin

Higher Education Expert

Jesse is a world leader in the integration of the science of learning into formal teaching settings. He is an Adjunct Associate Professor at the University of Lethbridge and Director at The Academy for the Scholarship of Learning. Huge advocate of the science of learning, he provides people with ideas about how they can use it in their classrooms. Jesse holds a PhD in Psychology from the University of Wales, Bangor.

   

Latest Articles

View all
  • Science
  • Technology
  • Companies
  • Environment
  • Global Economy
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Society