Why Dynamic Planning? Because Static Planning Is History

Why Dynamic Planning? Because Static Planning Is History

Brian Kalish 23/04/2018 6

In my first article in this series, I described the concept of dynamic planning and how it differs from the historical static way of planning. Here, I am focusing on some of the impacts of changing the planning philosophy and process.

To change to a dynamic planning environment, there is a much greater premium placed on the ability to communicate the following to all the parties involved:

  • Why a change is taking place
  • What that change is
  • How the change will benefit the organization as it strives to reach the goals that have been set

Dealing with Constant Change

As a rule, nobody likes change. Even if that change has no material impact on us, it still creates some level of uncertainty and perhaps frustration. I have always found it useful to share Spencer Johnson’s Who Moved My Cheese with my teams and colleagues before implementing a new system or process. (As a rule, it’s just a good idea to read this book or watch the video every 18-24 months.)

One of the benefits of static planning is its stability. We get the game plan at the beginning of the year and pretty much follow that strategy until the end of the year. Unfortunately, we now live in a world where that luxury of stability no longer exists, and we must have the flexibility and agility to adapt to increasing uncertainty.

The ability to communicate within our teams and across departments is vital to the success of implementing and executing dynamic planning. I like to use the image of a competitive sailboat race to illustrate. While our goal is constant—to win the race—there are many actions the crew must make at the right time and place to succeed. Whether one is tacking or jibing, every crew member must know their role and to watch for the boom as it swings through the maneuver.

Pulling Together as a Single Organization

A benefit of dynamic planning is that it forces different departments and teams to cut across the silos that may exist and to operate in a more informed and coordinated manner. The idea isn’t to have more frequent planning meetings, but to get the organization to think in a more integrated way.

Dynamic planning also affords the organization the ability to track its progress in a much more real-time basis. By studying what is and is not working, on a more frequent basis, organizations are able to embrace successful tactics more quickly and discard those activities that are failing sooner.

The sooner we can identify that we are on the wrong path to reaching our goals, the greater amount of time we give ourselves to adjust and redeploy resources to overcome our challenges. That, in turn, will increase the likelihood of success.

Allocating Resources Intelligently

An additional benefit of dynamic planning is that it instills the philosophy of allocating resources where they are needed, when they are needed. The old style of planning basically afforded departments one opportunity to apply to the “bank” once a year and to wait to ask again for additional resources until the following year. This old way of thinking is counter-intuitive to how life actually works: The idea that we miss opportunities because we don’t process precognition is unreasonable and outdated in the fast-moving, fast-changing the world we actually inhabit.

The opposite is also true. Just because we once could secure resources at the beginning of the year, we shouldn’t be operating in an environment where we will be penalized if we don’t consume them all, whether it makes sense or not. Dynamic planning permits the movement of resources where they are needed most, without punishing anyone else for releasing those resources.

We live in today with a high degree of VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity); dynamic planning is one tool that should be used to address that reality.

Share this article

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

terms and condition.
  • Willam Peterson

    Dynamic planning takes the big picture into account in order to make a broad, responsible plan for the year ahead. It focuses more on strategy and flexbility, that's why it's better than static planning.

  • Hannah Eugene

    Although dynamic planning requires several revisions, it is still much more efficient.

  • Charles Hanniffy

    It's time to make a shift......

  • Alex Morgan

    I have never been a fan of static planning.

  • Harry Smith

    With dynamic planning, you’re free to focus more on the short term and the flexibility to do whatever it takes to move the needle closer and closer to your primary goals.

  • Ilan Miguel

    Dynamic planning gives you and your team the freedom to be strategic more than once a year.

Share this article

Brian Kalish

Finance Expert

Brian is Founder and Principal at Kalish Consulting. He is Former Executive Director – Global FP&A Practice at AFP. He has over 20 years of experience in Finance, FP&A, Treasury and Investor Relations. He previously held a number of treasury and finance positions with the FHLB, Washington Mutual/JP Morgan, NRUCFC, Fifth Third and Fannie Mae. He has spoken all over the world to audiences both large and small hosting FP&A Roundtable meetings in North America, Europe, Asia and soon South America. Brian attended Georgia Tech, in Atlanta, GA for his undergraduate studies in Business and the Pamplin College of Business at Virginia Tech for his graduate work. In 2014, Brian was awarded the Global Certified Corporate FP&A Professional designation.

Cookies user prefences
We use cookies to ensure you to get the best experience on our website. If you decline the use of cookies, this website may not function as expected.
Accept all
Decline all
Read more
Tools used to analyze the data to measure the effectiveness of a website and to understand how it works.
Google Analytics