China’s Cryptocurrency Can’t Fuel Financial Hegemony

China’s Cryptocurrency Can’t Fuel Financial Hegemony

Patrick Tan 13/02/2020 6

Despite being the world’s second largest economy, the Chinese yuan is painfully far behind in its share of global transactions — a digital yuan is unlikely to change that.

Thomas Fillmore was quietly fuming. His body language made it obvious he was upset, but to his three friends seated at the table with him, they either couldn’t care less, or hadn’t noticed his folded arms and furrowed brow.

Noticing their indifference, Fillmore cleared his throat loudly as he inspected the bill that had been presented by the waitress,

“Now see here gents, I don’t see why we should be splitting this bill four ways.”

“I only had a beer, Doug here had a burger and two beers, Jim had the nachos and a beer and Frank had a hot dog and a beer, it’s not fair.”

A collective, yet resigned groan emanated from the trio seated at the table. Doug interjected,

“Fine, what do you suggest then?”

Fillmore whipped out his smartphone and started hammering away on his calculator app,

“Well, including tax and tips, my total amounts to seven bucks forty-seven, Doug, yours amounts to…”

And for the next five minutes, Fillmore, almost gleefully, broke down the amounts owed by each individual on the bill, right down to the last cent.

For Fillmore, it wasn’t so much having to pay for food and beverage which he had not consumed, it was more the inequitable distribution of an economic burden which irritated him. To his mathematically inclined mind, shouldn’t the person consuming more pay more?

Second Largest Economy, Second Rate Currency

Yet for all intents and purposes, China’s rise as the world’s second largest economy, has not been accompanied by a similar rise in the use of the Chinese yuan as a vehicle to facilitate international commerce.

Not too long ago, when Japan was the world’s second largest economy, the Japanese yen rose alongside with Japan, as one of the world’s major currencies, traded alongside pairs such as the dollar, the euro and the Swiss franc and touted as an alternative to the dollar for invoicing global transactions.

Yet somehow, the presence of the Chinese yuan in the global financial markets has been muted at best.

According to a recent survey by the Bank for International Settlements, in terms of foreign exchange market turnover, the yuan is the eight most traded currency, with a share of only 4.3%, ranking just after the Swiss franc.

By way of comparison, in 2018, the size of Switzerland’s economy was US$679 billion, while China’s was US$13.6 trillion.

It’s Not The Size That Matters, It’s How You Use It

As China has been expanding economically, one of the key issues facing Beijing is whether or not the yuan can eventually enjoy the same currency status as its economic power.

To be sure, the gap between a country’s currency share and the size of its economy is not a new phenomenon. It took decades before the dollar was able to replace the British pound as a key international currency.

And becoming a key international currency is not without costs as well — as Japan in the 1980s, an ascendant economic power, demonstrated in its reticence to internationalize the yen.

But there are key benefits to a domestic currency becoming a key international currency.

First, there is significant seigniorage to be had from the difference between the cost to print and issue money, to the things that that money can buy globally.

Then there’s how a country’s monetary policy has additional room for maneuvering when its currency is a global, even when interest rates are at or near zero, because policy moves by a country’s central bank can have huge ramifications across the world.

And when a country’s national currency achieves global currency status, it allows banks headquartered in that country to conduct their global banking business more easily. It’s no surprise that all of the world’s major banks are represented in a few square miles surrounding lower Manhattan.

Finally, global currency status allows a country to use its currency as a weapon to add sting to unilaterally imposed sanctions, as well as to project soft power in urging countries to get in line with its foreign policy objectives.

The benefits of a country’s national currency becoming the dominant global currency are myriad and well documented and so it should come as no surprise that China would harbor such ambitions that the yuan could one day assume this role as well.

For after all, what value is a blue water navy, if you need to use dollars to refuel and resupply in a foreign port?

It’s The Network Stupid

Yet the ability of a country’s national currency to become a global currency has no direct correlation with the size of a country’s economy. The essence of a currency’s importance lies in its network externality — the number of people who use it — and nowhere is this more apparent than for an international currency.

There’s a reason why dollars are so dominant. From Laos to Lithuania, dollars are accepted where other currencies would receive a puzzled look — network externality matters.

Which is why there is so much regulatory opposition to Facebook’s proposed Libra cryptocurrency — Facebook already has substantial network externality and combining Instagram and Whatsapp to that ecosystem, could well be on its way to creating an international financial hegemony without so much as a national border or a navy.

That a digital currency might have the potential to fuel financial hegemony must have no doubt been on Beijing’s mind when the People’s Bank of China, the Chinese central bank, first floated the idea for a central bank-issued digital currency.

Two Sides Of The Same Coin

Facebook and China’s approaches to digital currency represent the dichotomy of visions as to what an international currency could one day look like.

If Libra becomes a reality, it might mean a gradual shift of international currencies towards a multi-polar world order, one that is led by private initiative and one that would also usher in the potential for non-governed cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin to enter the fray.

Given that Libra is expected to be backed by a basket of short-term government securities and bank deposits from major economies, it has the potential to substantially undermine a dollar-dominated international financial system.

China’s vision of a global currency led by the digital yuan is different. Top down, the digital yuan can simultaneously be an instrument for surveillance and oppression. Chinese citizens looking to avoid governmental overreach may then be forced to delve underground into alternative mediums of exchange, such as Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

But the digital yuan is likely to have far less reach, perhaps confined to those countries which are dependent on China’s trillion-dollar Belt and Road infrastructure initiative, or supporting global retail payments via WeChat Pay or Alipay.

Because what’s holding the yuan back from its status as a international currency is not technology.

The basic three functions of money are as a store of value, a medium of exchange and a unit of account — all three functions are important and interrelated when internationalizing a national currency.

If a currency is a medium of exchange, it can be used as an invoicing currency in international trade, which facilitates growth of a country’s financial market to facilitate hedging and funding of that currency, which in turn, enhances its role as a store of value.

Just Like Gold, It Must Be Tested In Fire

But the true test of an international currency is not in times of calm, it is in times of crisis.

In a crisis, who would provide liquidity for a global stablecoin such as Libra? Would the Federal Reserve be expected to bail out Libra because Facebook is an American company?

Similarly, if China’s digital yuan were to achieve international currency status, would China be able to cope with a liquidity crisis on a global scale? Does it possess the wherewithal to do so?

Using technology alone is not a magic pill that can convert a national currency into an international one.

Because technology in and of itself does not solve the fundamental issue of liquidity provision, without which an international currency could not properly function, it is like sticking a Mercedes hood ornament on a lousy car — it becomes obvious when you drive it.

Take for instance the U.S. Treasury Department’s response to the 2008 global financial crisis — a depression was in all likelihood averted by Washington’s action to pour liquidity into the American financial system, calming markets and shoring up banks.

The strength of America’s institutions went on display during the global financial crisis, despite the crisis itself being very much a creation of the American financial system.

The difficulty with liquidity lies in the fact that the world is not yet truly global.

Technology in and of itself cannot solve the complicated problems of liquidity provision that are currently managed by a combination of various imperfect mechanisms.

Against a backdrop of half measures, the dollar still stands out as the least objectionable among other currencies, which allows the United States to continue to enjoy global financial hegemony.

Just because the yuan becomes digital, doesn’t necessarily mean that it will become international.

China’s cryptocurrency may end up becoming precisely that — China’s.

Share this article

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

terms and condition.
  • Joe Price

    This is move that could potentially lead to greater state control.

  • Barry Robinson

    One more reason Bitcoin is better. Thank you China.

  • Pip Holden

    Smart person here :)

  • Rob Reynolds

    Scary when the government controls your ability to pay for things

  • Kumar Mohit

    China will probably back their cryptocurrency with gold. That would be a disaster for the dollar.

  • Gary Hargan

    First the cashless society, next the chip implant.... it’s all happening so fast.

Share this article

Patrick Tan

Crypto Expert

Patrick is an innovative entrepreneur and a lawyer passionate about cryptocurrencies and the business world. He is the CEO of Novum Global Technologies, a cryptocurrency quantitative trading firm. He understands the business concerns of founders and business people helping them to utilise the legal framework to structure their companies to take advantage of emerging technologies such as the blockchain in order to reach greater heights. His passion for travel, marketing and brand building has led him across careers and continents. He read law at the National University of Singapore and graduated with Honors in the Upper Division and joined one of Singapore’s top law firms, Allen & Gledhill where he was called to the Singapore Bar as an Advocate & Solicitor in 2005. He created Purer Skin, a skincare and inner beauty company which melds the traditional wisdom of ancient Asian ingredients such as Bird's Nest with modern technology. In 2010, his partner and himself successfully raised $589,000 from the National Research Foundation of Singapore under the Prime Minister’s Office. He has played a key role in the growth of Purer Skin from 11 retail points in Singapore to over 755 retail points in Singapore and 2 overseas in less than a year. He taught himself graphic design, coding, website design and video editing to create the Purer Skin brand and finished his training at a leading Digital Media Company. 


Cookies user prefences
We use cookies to ensure you to get the best experience on our website. If you decline the use of cookies, this website may not function as expected.
Accept all
Decline all
Read more
Tools used to analyze the data to measure the effectiveness of a website and to understand how it works.
Google Analytics