After Cambridge Analytica, What Are The Regulatory Risks To Facebook?

After Cambridge Analytica, What Are The Regulatory Risks To Facebook?

Thanks to a combination of luck, as other major stories were few the past few days, and a still volatile attitude towards Big Tech in the political world, Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal has gone from what could have been a seemingly relative minor incident to one that is both threatening Facebook's business model and suddenly increasing regulatory concerns for the company. Zuckerberg even issued a rare public apology, as users are deeply troubled by this seeming breach of privacy.

While the actual events have been rehashed many times in the media the past few days, essentially the incident came down to Facebook allowing an academic to acquire Facebook user data but then he shared it beyond its original parameters to Cambridge Analytica, with Facebook apparently incorrectly believing the data had been deleted for several years.

Also worth noting is how while only about 270,000 people explicitly gave consent to and used the app the professor used to collect the data, the data mining by the app collected the data of over 50 million people in total by mining the data of their friends and connections as well. Essentially this means less than .5% of users whose data was collected gave explicit conscious consent to even the initial collection, let alone the subsequent transferring.

Given the company's relationship with President Donald Trump’s 2016 general election campaign, the 2016 primary campaigns of Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Ben Carson, Brexit, and politics in general, it was easy prey for a news media that knows anything about potential Trump scandals is proven ratings and clicks.

The events have also suddenly raised concern over whether Facebook may suddenly face sudden increased regulatory scrutiny, which also was brewing as the company faced heavy questioning over its role in the 2016 election in being used as a tool for Russian bots and misinformation campaigns, as well as its alleged censoring of conservative opinions on the platform. Its recent News Feed change, while a needed business reaction to potentially fatal declining user activity, also lost it suddenly many publisher and pages allies who have become annoyed at the sudden change for what was often a large investment for their business, with some companies even closing due to the new algorithms showing their content less.

Amid all this, Facebook stock tumbled roughly 12% this week from a close of $185.09 on Friday to a low of about $162.82 on Tuesday, although today it has rallied a little.

While Facebook has been the subject of many hearings before Congress over the years, now Senators from both sides of the aisle are demanding both potential regulatory oversight on Facebook and that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg himself testify before Congress. Previously only Facebook executives, not Zuckerberg himself, have been sent before our nation's elected body.

Although much of the attention is on Facebook's regulatory concerns in the United States, I believe the real regulatory threat to the company right now comes from Europe. In the United States, it is very likely that many policymakers do not feel confident enough yet to know what kind of regulations they themselves would be comfortable with placing on Facebook, let alone creating a regulatory scheme that would be able to pass Congress itself. For many policymakers, it still seems like the companies are addressing the concerns sufficiently whereby inherent legislative inertia is likely to continue.

Given the lack of clear regulatory agency control over the tech giant as a whole either, I still believe the U.S. regulatory threat remains minimal.

In Europe however, there is both the will and the way. Not only have European authorities been attacking the tech giants, such as Google, for years over privacy concerns, they've actually been implementing massive fines, anti-trust actions, and other sanctions with increasing frequency. It seems tech companies are finding few defenders in Europe, where a new privacy law will increase data transparency and control by consumers. Furthermore, the European Union has also just enacted a 3% digital revenue tax that will hurt tech companies as well.

Every time a scandal happens in the United States over one of the tech giants, immediately regulatory fears arise. However the main factor right now preventing coherent regulation in the United States is that U.S. policymakers essentially are afraid that they might disrupt the modern Internet services industry in a horribly negative way if they engage in the wrong kind of regulation on what they believe is still a delicate, even if big-money, sector. In short, U.S. representatives and regulators on both sides of the aisle are not favoring the European approach, which has been fueled in part by a greater cultural interest in privacy.

Policymaking always has a dash of uncertainty to it, but at the moment I believe regulatory concerns are overblown. The mishap is serious, but the most predictable course of action is that Facebook itself will take care to tighten its platform and thereby continue to satisfy both users and authorities for now. The selloff seems more a jittery reaction rather than a market re-valuation of the real long-term potential and risks of the company.

Share this article

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

terms and condition.
  • John Matheus

    Great piece! Congrats to everyone involved

  • Dean Insley

    I stopped using Facebook when they started showing ads in videos. While I am wasting my time, they are earning billions.

  • Luke Thacker

    You know when you use an app it gives a warning to you whether or not you want to allow the access to the requested data. If the user pressed allow, then it means they are giving consent to the developer to use the data.

  • Brad Worsech

    Marc Zuckerberg is the least trustworthy guy on the planet

  • Will Kulik

    My Facebook data is useless

  • Rishabh Sharma

    What about all the data that Facebook is legally selling to third parties? The only difference here - The CIA didn't pay for it.

  • Danny Swift

    In reply to: Rishabh Sharma

    I thought Facebook was a good player in our world. Obviously all they care about is money. Time to delete Facebook.

  • Alex Newton

    Deleted in 2010. Instagram in 2014. The only product from this blue clan I use is Whatsapp because people stick to it. Have already brought core people to Signal.

  • Ian Fallens

    Facebook owns every relevant social media today, from Instagram to Whatsapp. Snapchat is dying, and Twitter and Reddit aren't really about yourself.Let's say Facebook will die. How the next social platform won't become the next Facebook? Startups always get acquired by bigger fishes, I don't think there's much we can do...

  • Steve Larson

    Do people even still use Facebook?

  • Patrick Vargas

    In reply to: Steve Larson

    Regardless of your opinion, It is still the number one social media platform

  • Steve Larson

    In reply to: Patrick Vargas

    I haven't used it for a number of years. This sort of scandal is why I've never trusted it.

  • Tim Drake

    Facebook= the downfall of humanity, any user of this program i do not consider human anyway , fake people fakebook! Cant wait until its gone

Share this article

Erich Reimer

Political Expert

Erich is a DC-based policy and public affairs strategist, entrepreneur, political/financial analyst, and columnist. He has spent well over a decade involved in the U.S political, business, government, legal, and non-profit sectors. He writes columns formedia outlets such as Fox News and The American Spectator and appears frequently on cable TV news. 

Cookies user prefences
We use cookies to ensure you to get the best experience on our website. If you decline the use of cookies, this website may not function as expected.
Accept all
Decline all
Read more
Tools used to analyze the data to measure the effectiveness of a website and to understand how it works.
Google Analytics