The Problem with List and Leave

The Problem with List and Leave

The real estate industry has a term for a certain type of realtor behavior-list and leave. Maybe you have experienced it the last time you hired a realtor to sell your property. What happens is after signing a listing agreement, the realtor puts a big, attractive sign in your front lawn and lists your property on the multilist service. Then, they drop out of sight. Ghosted. Dark side of the moon. After waiting for potential buyers to do most of the work on the internet, the next time you see your realtor is at the closing table where your friendly agent collect their commission check.

The list and leave "innovation" model is familiar too. The person who comes up with the idea is neither willing nor able to do something with it. So, he or she turfs making it into a revenue generating something to an organization that promises to do all the hard stuff. The person who swears by the idea has little more to do with it until it's time to collect the royalty checks. Not a bad gig.

This happens when doctors "don't have time for all that business stuff" or when non-sick care entrepreneurs don't really want to get their hands dirty with doctors "who are lousy business people anyway". I mean, what can be so hard about sickcare innovation anyway?

Unfortunately, in my experience, this list and leave strategy doesn't usually work because:

  1. The failure rate of new ideas is high enough when all hands are on deck, let alone when the idea person or inventor is AWOL.
  2. Most of the time someone else has the same or similar idea and, quite possibly, has already failed trying to do something with it.
  3. It's hard to pivot when you don't have possession of the ball.
  4. Those that don't have skin in the game, by definition, are not significantly invested in the outcome.
  5. Everyone thinks they have a great idea. The problem is what they think is irrelevant until you demonstrate product market fit.
  6. Most don't understand the difference between an idea, an invention, an improvement and an innovation.
  7. Most don't understand the difference between a technology, a product and a business.
  8. Because of the above, there are unrealistic expectations about the likelihood of success and the time and costs involved.
  9. Raising seed stage money is generally about an investor having some kind or realtionship with the founder or a friend of the founder or a friend who invested in the founder.
  10. Savvy members of the innovation food chain can tell a hood ornament when they see one.

Think of the list and leave model as the flip side of founder's syndrome.

Sure, there are commercial technology transfer models that license something and then create a team to do the heavy lifting to get it to market.. But, in most of those instances, the PI or inventor is expected to contribute know how or continue IP or product development in some role. At the least, they show up for an open house or two before depositing the check.

Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA is the President and CEO of the Society of Physician Entrepreneurs on Twitter@ArlenMD.

Share this article

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

terms and condition.
  • Tom Boon

    Do not expect others to do your work.

  • Megan James

    We have become too complacent to sort out problems with technology.

Share this article

Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA

Former Contributor

Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA is a professor emeritus of otolaryngology, dentistry, and engineering at the University of Colorado School of Medicine and the Colorado School of Public Health and President and CEO of the Society of Physician Entrepreneurs at He has created several medical device and digital health companies. His primary research centers around biomedical and health innovation and entrepreneurship and life science technology commercialization. He consults for and speaks to companies, governments, colleges and universities around the world who need his expertise and contacts in the areas of bio entrepreneurship, bioscience, healthcare, healthcare IT, medical tourism -- nationally and internationally, new product development, product design, and financing new ventures. He is a former Harvard-Macy fellow and In 2010, he completed a Fulbright at Kings Business, the commercialization office of technology transfer at Kings College in London. He recently published "Building the Case for Biotechnology." "Optical Detection of Cancer", and " The Life Science Innovation Roadmap". He is also an associate editor of the Journal of Commercial Biotechnology and Technology Transfer and Entrepreneurship and Editor-in-Chief of Medscape. In addition, He is a faculty member at the University of Colorado Denver Graduate School where he teaches Biomedical Entrepreneurship and is an iCorps participant, trainer and industry mentor. He is the Chief Medical Officer at and and Chairman of the Board at GlobalMindED at, a non-profit at risk student success network. He is honored to be named by Modern Healthcare as one of the 50 Most Influential Physician Executives of 2011 and nominated in 2012 and Best Doctors 2013.

Cookies user prefences
We use cookies to ensure you to get the best experience on our website. If you decline the use of cookies, this website may not function as expected.
Accept all
Decline all
Read more
Tools used to analyze the data to measure the effectiveness of a website and to understand how it works.
Google Analytics